![]() So, you must decide what is the direction in which you want to start, and the scope in which you want to use it. WB offers more intuitive interface, but unfortunately, from my point of view, without APADL experience is very difficult to have an good control on results and solution. All older versions impose supplementary knowledge of APDL programing which are not easily. Unfortunately, ANSYS start hard work with WB in this direction only from version 12.0. Using APDL you will learn to use nodes and elements for processing, solve and post-processing. Because some simulations implicate more than two pieces in contact, using APDL you will be forced to learn about how it works, how can be changed, modified, etc. Other reason is that forcing you to made some hand calculus to check if your results corresponding to simulation. This is very useful because you will begin to understand how it works every command, which means every setup, where is useful or not. I have an good reason to tell you this: from my experience I observe that APDL is very ¨unfriendly¨ for beginners, because is not so intuitive like WB and all setups must be made by the hand. If you are beginner, than is better to start with ANSYS Classic (APDL or latest MAPDL). To choose through him, you must to know your level in usage of ANSYS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |